Current / Economics

The Wrong Turn

The Strange Rise of Rational Expectations

I’ve touched on several possible sources of stagflation in the past, but am still trying to wrap my head around the evidence I’ve uncovered that austerity has a long history triggering economic contractions and rises in the price level simultaneously.  Austerity, in the form of VAT increases, hit Japan on 1 April in 1989, 1997, and 2014:
 Historical Data ChartHistorical Data ChartJapan Core Inflation Rate
The hits kept coming, striking the Japanese economy as well:
 Historical Data ChartHistorical Data ChartHistorical Data Chart
Each April instance was stagflationary, which shouldn’t surprise anyone given the truth that austerity is contractionary.  What might be surprising is the fact that business confidence…
 Historical Data ChartHistorical Data ChartJapan Business Confidence
…was a lagging, not leading indicator.  This year’s VAT rise wasn’t a sudden policy shift–the tax increase was passed by the Japanese legislature on 10 August 2012 under the tutelage of Yoshihiko Noda, Shinzo Abe’s predecessor.  The confidence of Japan’s consumers is also perplexing:
 Historical Data ChartHistorical Data ChartHistorical Data Chart
Consumer confidence did drop prior to each VAT increase, then immediately rebounded in the face of an economic contraction.  Is there any good gage, any indicator for the effects austerity will wreck on economic performance?
 Historical Data ChartHistorical Data ChartHistorical Data Chart
Ultimately, it is far more important what consumers are spending rather than concepts such as ‘confidence’ or other amorphous sentiments.


The Japanese experience demonstrates that perhaps the very concept of rational expectations is flawed.  Consumer confidence crashed long before the Great Recession commenced…
 Historical Data Chart
…but spending did not decline until mid-2008…
 Historical Data Chart
…taking the economy with it:
 Historical Data Chart
The American experience mirrored Japan in the strange way consumer sentiment rebounded in the summer of 2008, even as the bottom was falling out.  Does this indicate Americans had profoundly negative expectations six to seven years ago, or are people both behaviorally and in practice profoundly reactionary?

So what, who cares?  What difference does it make whether economics is driven by proactive or reactive sentiments?  One primary concern–monetary policy.  With the declarations that Abenomics has failed, calls for the Bank of Japan to tighten the monetary supply are sure to follow.  The Federal Reserve clearly is feeling intense pressure to raise interest rates now that QE has ended, despite the fact that inflation still isn’t cooperating with the central bank’s demands that the rate rise to 2.0%:

Historical Data Chart

United States Inflation Rate

Before the BOJ and the Fed repeat Jean-Claude Trichet’s reign of error, perhaps it would be wise to discern how the petroleum market remains horrifically broken and the gold standard has been replaced by a far more insidious set of price controls.


Oil here.


One thought on “The Wrong Turn

  1. Pingback: Austerity Causes Stagflation | In The Corner, Mumbling and Drooling

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s